<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watch Oscar Winner Logorama Online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urbandiner.ca/2010/03/08/watch-oscar-winner-logorama-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urbandiner.ca/2010/03/08/watch-oscar-winner-logorama-online/</link>
	<description>A Fine Guide To Eating and Drinking in British Columbia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:16:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: canucklehead</title>
		<link>http://urbandiner.ca/2010/03/08/watch-oscar-winner-logorama-online/comment-page-1/#comment-51843</link>
		<dc:creator>canucklehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbandiner.ca/?p=10670#comment-51843</guid>
		<description>The winners last night said that it took them six and half years to make the short film - and I was convinced it was due to copyright issues.  But apparently not - it was a side project that guys from a French graphics house put together in their spare time. 

A google of related legal issues turns up suprisingly little - except this excerpt from Eye Magazine:   &quot;Most surprisingly, as Laura Murray, an expert on intellectual property at Queen’s University in Ontario, argues, there’s no real grounds for a trademark lawsuit here, unless McDonald’s, for example, can show that Logorama causes confusion in the marketplace (in addition to mayhem in the strip mall).&quot;

Huh.  Half the web chatter is convinced this short film is going to get shut down sooner or later - and advise to watch soon before it goes away.  But perhaps what is really suprising is how powerful we all think logo&#039;s are - and the resulting self censorship we unwittingly participate in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The winners last night said that it took them six and half years to make the short film &#8211; and I was convinced it was due to copyright issues.  But apparently not &#8211; it was a side project that guys from a French graphics house put together in their spare time. </p>
<p>A google of related legal issues turns up suprisingly little &#8211; except this excerpt from Eye Magazine:   &#8220;Most surprisingly, as Laura Murray, an expert on intellectual property at Queen’s University in Ontario, argues, there’s no real grounds for a trademark lawsuit here, unless McDonald’s, for example, can show that Logorama causes confusion in the marketplace (in addition to mayhem in the strip mall).&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh.  Half the web chatter is convinced this short film is going to get shut down sooner or later &#8211; and advise to watch soon before it goes away.  But perhaps what is really suprising is how powerful we all think logo&#8217;s are &#8211; and the resulting self censorship we unwittingly participate in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

